Jump to content

Latest Posts

Holder Frames Ferguson PD For Racism Using Bogus 'Disparate Impact' Stats

Casino67   Posted Yesterday, 08:46 PM

Holder wasn't going to come away empty-handed.

Isis burns thousands of rare books and manuscripts from Mosul's libraries

Valin   Posted Yesterday, 07:59 PM

Maybe this is the start of wiping these savages from the memory of civilized peoples on this planet.



They are (IMO) worse than the Iconoclasts

EPA Chief Gina McCarthy Can't Answer Climate Questions

Valin   Posted Yesterday, 07:56 PM

Despite Wrongdoing, Former IRS Exec Lois Lerner Likely To Walk Free

Geee   Posted Yesterday, 07:31 PM

Investors Business Daily:

Rep. Peter Roskam is now chairman of the House Ways and Means subcommittee whose jurisdiction includes oversight of the Internal Revenue Service, and hence of Lois Lerner's legacy.


He knows how interesting her career was before she, as head of the IRS exempt-organizations division, directed the suppression of conservative advocacy groups by delaying and denying them the tax-exempt status that was swiftly given to comparable liberal groups.


In 2013, Roskam, in a televised committee hearing, told the story of Al Salvi, who in 1996 was the Republicans' Senate candidate against then-congressman, now-Sen. Dick Durbin.


Democrats filed charges with the Federal Election Commission against Salvi's campaign, charges that threatened to dominate the campaign's final weeks.


Salvi telephoned the head of the FEC's Enforcement Division, who he says told him: "Promise me you will never run for office again, and we'll drop this case." So said Lerner.


After Salvi lost, FBI agents visited his elderly mother, demanding to know, concerning her $2,000 contribution to her son's campaign, where she got "that kind of money."


When a federal court held that the charges against Salvi were spurious, the FEC's losing lawyer was Lerner.Scissors-32x32.png

Holder Frames Ferguson PD For Racism Using Bogus 'Disparate Impact' Stats

Geee   Posted Yesterday, 07:31 PM

Investors Business Daily:

Racial Politics: Unable to pin racism charges on Ferguson policeman Darren Wilson in the shooting death of Michael Brown, Attorney General Eric Holder is using half-baked data to manufacture a case of racism against his entire police force.


Holder's race-baiting civil rights crew combed through several years of Ferguson Police Department data on traffic stops, searches and arrests and "found a pattern of racial disparities in Ferguson's police activities."


"African Americans are overrepresented in FPD's vehicular stops" and victims of "racial bias," Holder concludes in his report.


He notes that blacks accounted for 85% of vehicle stops, "despite comprising only 67% of Ferguson's population," while whites made up 15% of stops, despite representing 29% of the population.


So there you have it, a slam-dunk case of racism, right? Hardly.


Outrageously, the nation's top prosecutor failed to control for factors that explain the racial "disparity" in traffic stops, such as speeding, DUI, expired license plates, headlight, seat-belt and child-restraint violations and other reasons for being pulled over.


EPA Chief Gina McCarthy Can't Answer Climate Questions

Geee   Posted Yesterday, 07:28 PM

Sen. Sullivan Grills EPA Chief Over Offensive Comments About Alaskan Native Gifts


Gina McCarthy, administrator for the Environmental Protection Agency, overstayed her welcome in Alaska last year. When Alaskan native tribes honored the EPA worker with gifts, she returned the favor by telling the Wall Street Journal she threw one of the “f-ing things away” and that the moose meat she was given could “gag a maggot.”


During Wednesday’s Environment and Public Works Committee, Sen. Dan Sullivan (R-AK) grilled McCarthy about her ‘disturbing’ comments that were featured in the largely positive Wall Street Journal profile.


“A lot of people saw that as a glowing article,” he said. “Most people in Alaska saw it as an incredible disrespect to the people of my state.”


Sullivan then offered McCarthy the opportunity to apologize for her insensitive comments. She did so, yet also insisted her words were ‘taken out of context.’


"I'm happy to apologize for those remarks,” she said. “I will tell you they were taken out of context, but it doesn't matter because they hurt individuals and tribes that I care about."Scissors-32x32.png



Coffee Shop

Casino67   Posted Yesterday, 07:19 PM

Has anyone seen this show, Schitt's Creek?  I can't get it on my service.  It IS a real show.

Coffee Shop

Casino67   Posted Yesterday, 07:15 PM

Hil is almost attractive in this picture, IMO.





EPA Chief Gina McCarthy Can't Answer Climate Questions

Geee   Posted Yesterday, 07:11 PM

Investors Business Daily:

Climate Change: Gina McCarthy, head of the EPA, can't answer basic questions about global temperatures, climate models or numbers of hurricanes. She didn't know being a global warming zealot requires knowledge of math.


If the science of climate change was "settled," you'd think one of the generals in the war on global warming would have memorized the numbers that point to our planetary doom from a menace the administration says is a greater threat than terrorism.


But McCarthy was asked some pretty simple questions Wednesday at a Senate hearing Wednesday on her request for $8.6 billion to help fight the claimed imminent doom of climate change, and her performance didn't help her case.


One of the questions involved droughts and the claim that their frequency has increased due to warming that is said to be caused by mankind's increased production of greenhouse gas, such as carbon dioxide, the basis for all life on Earth but judged by the EPA to be a pollutant.


How High Will Your Health Insurance Premiums Go In 2015?

Geee   Posted Yesterday, 07:09 PM

Shock Poll: Half The Uninsured Want ObamaCare Repealed


Health Care: ObamaCare was supposed to be a gift to the uninsured. Maybe someone should have checked with them first. A new poll finds the uninsured hate ObamaCare more than any other group.

The Economist/YouGov poll asked the public a series of questions about ObamaCare, and then broke down the findings based on their insurance status.

As with many other polls, this one finds widespread disapproval of the law. Fully 43% say it's a failure, compared with just 25% who think it has been a success. Nearly one in five say it's been "a complete failure."

Almost half (48%) think the law has pushed insurance prices up, compared with 16% who say ObamaCare has reduced the rate of premium growth. (So much for "bending the cost curve down.")Scissors-32x32.png